Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 24-625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, Idaho Judicial Council, JOSH TEWALT, BRETT PHILLIPS, Access to Courts Coordinator State of Idaho and others
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 21-35643
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, TYRELL DAVIS, UNITED STATES JOINT TASK FORCE and others
Nathan Byerly v. USA, et al
as 21-55691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Defendant / Appellee:
ICS TELECOM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INMATE TELEPHONE SERVICE and others
Nathan Byerly v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 21-35518
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSH BODE, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and STATE OF IDAHO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 21-35399
Respondent / Appellee:
IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTION, ADA COUNTY, NEIL PRICE, John Doe and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 21-35328
Respondent / Appellee:
IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTION, HOAGLAND, First Name Unknown, ADA COUNTY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. United States Joint Task Force, et al
as 21-35286
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES JOINT TASK FORCE, SHELDAUL, John Doe, ADA COUNTY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 21-35257
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES JOINT TASK FORCE, SHELDAHL, John Doe, ADA COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Nathan Byerly v. United States Joint Task Force, et al
as 21-70528
Petitioner:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JOINT TASK FORCE, ADA COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH and others
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 21-35122
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES JOINT TASK FORCE, ADA COUNTY, TYRELL DAVIS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
