Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Appvion, Incorporated, et al v. Fort James Corporation, et al
as 13-2568
Plaintiff - Appellee:
APPVION, INCORPORATED, formerly known as Appleton Papers Incorporated and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellant:
FORT JAMES CORPORATION, GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, LLC and GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP, formerly known as Fort James Operating Company
Appvion, Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al
as 13-2522
Plaintiff:
NCR CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
APPVION, INCORPORATED, formerly known as APPLETON PAPERS INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
NCR Corporation v. George A. Whiting Paper Compan, et al
as 13-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. WHITING PAPER COMPANY, PH GLATFELTER COMPANY, MENASHA CORPORATION and others
USA, et al v. NCR Corporation
as 13-2441
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendant - Appellant:
NCR CORPORATION
Faulkner v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2012cv06963
Plaintiff:
Thomas Faulkner
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fields v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2012cv06767
Plaintiff:
Juamada Fields
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pohlman v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2012cv06731
Plaintiff:
Craig Pohlman
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Price v. NCR Corporation
as 1:2012cv03413
Plaintiff:
Mark Price
Defendant:
NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA, et al v. NCR Corporation
as 12-2069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Defendant - Appellant:
NCR CORPORATION
Allen v. Wheels, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
Tamara Allen
Defendant:
Wheels, Inc. and NCR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
