Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Steven McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 18-80102
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STEVEN MCARDLE
Defendant - Petitioner:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
Steven McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 17-17246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN MCARDLE
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
Nathan Riensche v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, et al
as 14-35375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RIENSCHE, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware corporation doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Steven McArdle v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al
as 13-17152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MCARDLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
Heather Stern, et al v. Karin Lynch
as 10-57062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HEATHER STERN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
KARIN LYNCH
Objector:
MARC GAMBELLO and GENE HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless Corporation and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Cingular Wireless LLC
Heather Stern, et al v. Marc Gambello, et al
as 10-56929
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HEATHER STERN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, BROOKE RANDOLPH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, JOHN GIRARD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
MARC GAMBELLO and GENE HOPKINS
Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Cingular Wireless Corporation and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Cingular Wireless LLC
Jared Peck, et al v. AT&T Mobility, et al
as 09-36113
Plaintiff:
JARED PECK
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWDEN, a Washington resident, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaward limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, AT&T MOBILITY, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, AKA Cingular Wireless, LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless and others
Nathan Riensche v. Cingular Wireless LLC, et al
as 09-35987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RIENSCHE, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware corporation doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Steven McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 09-17218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVEN MCARDLE
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS LLC and NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
Anamiria Madgrigal, et al v. USDCFR
as 09-73082
:
In re: ANAMIRIA MADGRIGAL, DBA Aztec Cellular, Inc. and AZTEC CELLULAR, INC.
Petitioner:
ANAMIRIA MADGRIGAL, DBA Aztec Cellular, Inc. and AZTEC CELLULAR, INC.
Respondent:
USDC, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a corporation and AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
