Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Industrial Customers of Northw v. BPA
as 09-70290
Petitioner:
INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS OF NORTHWEST UTILITIES
Intervenor:
ALCOA INC. and NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
NORTHWEST POWER AND CONSERVATION COUNCIL
Clatskanie Peoples Utility Dis v. BPA
as 09-70292
Petitioner:
CLATSKANIE PEOPLES UTILITY DISTRICT
Intervenor:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLP, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON and NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Georgia-Pacific, LLP v. BPA
as 09-70289
Petitioner:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLP
Intervenor:
NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. BPA, et al
as 09-70268
Petitioner:
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.
Intervenor:
PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL, THE CITY OF SEATTLE, GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLP and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Avista Corporation v. BPA, et al
as 09-70265
Petitioner:
AVISTA CORPORATION
Intervenor:
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD (EWEB), PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHIGTON and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. BPA, et al
as 09-70262
Petitioner:
PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.
Intervenor:
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHINGTON, IDAHO POWER COMPANY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE and others
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amicus Curiae:
NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
PPC, et al v. United States Department of En, et al
as 08-74811
Petitioner:
PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL, NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES and PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE
Intervenor:
ALCOA INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
