Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NORTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
NANCY NORTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
NORTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00921
Plaintiff:
NANCY NORTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BANKS et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2018cv02146
Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. BANKS and DB
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, Two Rivers Public Charter School Inc., JANEA HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zoran Zuza v. Office Of The High Representa, et al
as 16-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Zoran Zuza
Defendant - Appellee:
Office Of The High Representative, Valentin Inzko, in his official capacity and Jeremy Ashdown, "Paddy", also known as Lord Ashdown Of Norton-Sub-Hamdon
Interested Party:
United States of America
Zoran Zuza v. Office of the High Rep., et al
as 16-7027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zoran Zuza
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Office of the High Representative, Jeremy Ashdown, "Paddy", also known as Lord Ashdown Of Norton-Sub-Hamdon and Valentin Inzko, in his official capacity
ZUZA v. OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTAITVE et al
as 1:2014cv01099
Defendant:
JEREMY ASHDOWN, LORD ASHDOWN OF NORTON-SUB-HAMDON, OFFICE OF THE HIGH REPRESENTAITVE and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ZORAN ZUZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RICHARDSON
Defendant:
TAMMY RICHARDSON, TAMMY WATSON, DEMARIOUS CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Angelo Richardson v. Eleanor Norton
as 12-5405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angelo Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
Eleanor Holmes Norton, Delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives
RICHARDSON v. NORTON
as 1:2012cv01937
Defendant:
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
