Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Frankard v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00163
Plaintiff:
Frankard and Kenneth Frankard
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Walters v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00141
Plaintiff:
Walters and Woody Walters
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Bourgeois v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00075
Plaintiff:
Bourgeois and Alfred Bourgeois
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Village of Nyack v. The 3M Company et al
as NYS/7:22-CV-00089
Plaintiff:
Village of Nyack
Defendant:
The 3M Company, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. and others
Lewis v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00048
Plaintiff:
Lewis and David R Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, AGC Inc and others
Cantrell v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00046
Plaintiff:
Cantrell and Gordon Ray Cantrell
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, AGC Inc and others
Lentz v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00047
Plaintiff:
Lentz and William H Lentz, III
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, AGC Inc and others
Budd v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:22-CV-00043
Plaintiff:
Budd and Nancy Budd
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Lowe v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:21-CV-04209
Plaintiff:
Lowe and Bruce Lowe
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Brookshire v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:21-CV-04207
Plaintiff:
Brookshire and Jesse Brookshire
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
