Cases 11 - 17 of 17
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a D.C. corporation
as 1:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT and BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
WRIGHT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
WANDA J. WRIGHT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and AMTRAK POLICE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE NEW JERSEY LODGE 189
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BODNAR v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BODNAR
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
WINDER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WINDER
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES et al
as 1:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN and PASSENGER RAIL LABOR BARGAINING COALITION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, LODGE 189 et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and SARAH BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES et al
as 1:2007cv01888
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY SIGNALMEN, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF FIREMAN & OILERS, SEIU and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
