Cases 1 - 6 of 6
WATKINS HOLDINGS S. R.L. et al v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN
as 1:2020cv01081
Petitioner:
WATKINS HOLDINGS S. R.L., WATKINS (NED) B.V. and WATKINS HOLDINGS S.A R.L.
Respondent:
KINGDOM OF SPAIN
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
USA v. Ned Jone
as 12-3046
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Ned Donnell Jones, also known as Domino
Ernest K. Lehmann & Associates, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-5148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest K. Lehmann & Associates of Montana, Inc. and Mount Royal Joint Venture
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Ned Farquhar, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, Department of Interior and others
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES et al v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2007cv00711
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, DAVID AGATSTEIN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and LINDA M. SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Maxwell, Lawrence, et al v. Snow, John
as 04-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence Stephen Maxwell, Brenda L. Abbott, Dorothy A. Albrecht and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John W. Snow, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of Treasury
:
Pueblo of Sandia v. Babbitt, Bruce, et al
as 98-5428
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pueblo of Sandia
Defendant - Appellee:
Bruce C. Babbitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Mike Espy, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture
Defendant:
Dan Glickman, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
Anne-Claire Von Hoyningen-Huene, William P. Kiely, Jr., Sandia Mountain Coalition and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
City of Albuquerque
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
