Cases
CT Dept. of Public Util. Ctrl v. FERC
as 09-1040
Petitioner: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut and Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: United Illuminating Company, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Northeast Utilities Companies and Maine Public Utilities Commission
CT Dept. of Public Utility v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1199
Petitioner: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, Maine Public Utilities Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: Braintree Electric Light Department, Massachusetts Attorney General, Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: NEPOOL Industrial Customer Coalition
CT Dept Pub Util v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1411
Petitioner: Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: New England Power Pool Participants Committee, ISO New England Inc., NSTAR Electric & Gas Corporation and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: New England Conference of Public Commissioners, New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners, State of Connecticut and Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
ME Pub Util Cmsn, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1001
Petitioner: Maine Public Utilities Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service and New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company, Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control, New England Power Pool Participants Committee and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Northeast Utilities Service Company, New England Power Company, Central Maine Power Company and others
CO Off Consum Coun, et al v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-1238
Petitioner: Colorado Office of Consumer Counsel, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: American Gas Association, Proliance Energy, LLC, Morgan Stanley and others
Intervenor: National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation and Upper Peninsula Power Company
Pub Util Dist 1 Wash v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 00-1174
Petitioner: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Trans-Elect, Inc., Boston Edison Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: Dynegy Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent: Edison Electric Institute
AT&T Corp v. FCC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 99-1538
Appellant - Appellant: AT&T Corporation
Appellee - Appellee: Federal Communications Commission
Intervenor: New York Telephone Company, doing business as Bell Atlantic-NY, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., NYNEX Long Distance Company and others
Terminated Party: CTSI, Inc.
Intervenor For Appellee: Rhythms NetConnections, Inc. and Competitive Telecommunications Association
Intervenor For Appellant: CloseCall America, Inc.
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?