Cases 61 - 70 of 331
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Toas, Inc.
as 1:2010cv06094
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Toas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. K&K Construction of Queens County Inc.
as 1:2010cv05696
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
K&K Construction of Queens County Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Notias Construction, Inc.,
as 1:2010cv05697
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Notias Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Summit Construction Group, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05555
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Summit Construction Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. ET Construction Corp.
as 1:2010cv05557
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Eduardo Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Structural Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05478
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Structural Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Windor Inc.
as 1:2010cv05479
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Windor Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Agostino Quality Carpentry, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05480
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Agostino Quality Carpentry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. McCloskey Contracting Corp
as 1:2010cv05178
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
McCloskey Contracting Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Metropolitan Millwork and Installations, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05177
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Millwork and Installations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
