Cases 1 - 10 of 216
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Eduardo Torres
as 1:2020cv04852
Plaintiff:
The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity Fund and others
Defendant:
Eduardo Torres d/b/a ET Construction Co. and Eduardo Torres doing business as ET Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Metal Lathers Local 46 Pension Fund et al v. River Avenue Contracting Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Metal Lathers Local 46 Pension Fund , Metal Lathers Local 46 Trust Fund , Metal Lathers Local 46 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
River Avenue Contracting Corp., RNC Industries LLC, Extreme Concrete Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Tristan Contracting Corp.
as 1:2010cv06626
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Tristan Contracting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. MKM Construction Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05889
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , The New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
MKM Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. K&K Construction of Queens County Inc.
as 1:2010cv05696
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
K&K Construction of Queens County Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Notias Construction, Inc.,
as 1:2010cv05697
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Notias Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Summit Construction Group, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05555
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Summit Construction Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. ET Construction Corp.
as 1:2010cv05557
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Eduardo Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Structural Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
as 1:2010cv05478
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Structural Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Windor Inc.
as 1:2010cv05479
Plaintiff:
The New York District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Windor Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
