Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Con Edison Co NY Inc, et al v. FERC
as 97-1554
Petitioner:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Public Service Electric & Gas Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern Illinois Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Shell Offshore, Inc. and others
:
and
No Muni Distr Grp, et al v. FERC
as 97-1457
Petitioner:
Northern Municipal Distributors Group, Midwest Region Gas Task Force Association, Brooklyn, Iowa and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Terra International Inc., ANR Pipeline Company, Northern Natural Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
American Iron and Steel Institute and Ag Processing Inc.
NorAm Gas Transm v. FERC
as 97-1101
Petitioner:
NorAm Gas Transmission Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
City of Clarksville, Tennessee, City of Springfield, Tennessee, City of Portland, Tennessee and others
:
SE MI Gas Co, et al v. FERC
as 96-1200
Petitioner:
Southeastern Michigan Gas Company and Michigan Gas Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Northern States Power Company (a Minnesota corporation), Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Michigan Public Service Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership
TN Valley Muni Gas v. FERC
as 93-1566
Petitioner:
Tennessee Valley Municipal Gas Association
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
ANR Pipeline Company, Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Vastar Gas Marketing, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
ARCO Oil and Gas Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Northern Illinois Gas Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
