Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hancock v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 5:2014cv01380
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Hancock, Jr
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , Experian Information Solutions Inc and Trans Union LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kirby et al v. O'Dens et al
as 4:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Elbert Kirby, Jr and Caleb Meadows
Defendant:
David M O'Dens , Settle & Pou, P.C. and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Kirby et al v. Resmae Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Elbert Kirby, Jr, Caleb Meadows and John Doe
Defendant:
Resmae Mortgage Corporation, LaSalle Bank National Association, US Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Luis v. Argent Mortgage Company, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00490
Plaintiff:
Steven Luis
Defendant:
Argent Mortgage Company, LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for Securitized Trust Argent Securities, Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2004-W5 , Ameriquest Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US Bank v. Ernst et al
as 5:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
US Bank
Defendant:
Jason Ernst and Vickie Ernst
Third_party_defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Layne v. Lawyers Title of Oklahoma City Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00489
Plaintiff:
Willie Layne
Defendant:
Lawyers Title of Oklahoma City Inc, OCWEN Loans Servicing LLC and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
