Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Sylvestre v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 0:2014cv62153
Plaintiff:
Johnny Sylvestre
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEARNE et al v. ACCESS MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARNE and PATRICIA HEARNE
Defendant:
ACCESS MORTGAGE CORPORATION , CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv61034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bekoff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv22917
Plaintiff:
Audrey Bekoff
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Carden et al v. ING Bank, FSB et al
as 9:2013cv80659
Plaintiff:
G. Alexander Carden and Stephanie B. Carden
Defendant:
ING Bank, FSB , ING Direct , Capital One, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Haver v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 8:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
Brian Haver
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Atwood v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 9:2011cv80898
Defendant:
Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
Helene Atwood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv24455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
