Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TYREE v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. et al
as 1:2019mc00038
Respondent:
SHELBY COUNTY, SHELBY COUNTY GENERAL SESSIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Petitioner:
MAURICE TYREE
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
GOLDBLATT v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE GOLDBLATT
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 15-7137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
STOLLER et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv01703
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER STOLLER
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, WILLIAM C. ERBEY, RONALD FARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BENTON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015mc00670
Plaintiff:
LARAY J. BENTON and GEORGIA W. BENTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv02025
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
