Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carroll v. Oklahoma City City of
as 5:2019cv00433
Plaintiff:
Arlon T Carroll
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hand Up Ministries Inc et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
Hand Up Ministries Inc and David Nichols
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , John Whetsel , David Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00275
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of Interior , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hughes Synergies Rail 90 MetNet LLC et al v. Oklahoma Department of Transportation et al
as 5:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Hughes Synergies Rail 90 MetNet LLC and Phil A Hughes
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Transportation , Association of Central Oklahoma Governments, Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rooney v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
Carol K Rooney
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of and Coxcom LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Chickasaw Nation et al v. Fallin et al
as 5:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Chickasaw Nation and Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, Rudolf John Herrmann, Tom Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. Albert Investment Co Inc et al
as 5:2008cv00637
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Albert Investment Co Inc, American Airlines Inc, APAC Arkansas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Flanagan v. Oklahoma City, City of
as 5:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
Earl Flanagan and Earl Flanagan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
