Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., E. R. Squibb & Sons L.L.C., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. EMD Serono, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01029
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , E.R. Squibb & Sons L.L.C. , Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
EMD Serono, Inc. , Merck KGaA and Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , E. R. Squibb & Sons L.L.C. , Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca UK Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. Genentech, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01027
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , E.R. Squibb & Sons L.L.C. , Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Genentech, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , E. R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. , Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. , E.R. Squibb & Sons L.L.C. , Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al v. Merck & Co Inc.
as 1:2014cv01131
Plaintiff:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
