Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA et al v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA , THOMAS L HEWITT and V. MICHAEL FERDINANDI
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , ANTHONY FOXX and PETER M. ROGOFF
Intervenor_defendant:
AAF HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY et al v. ROGOFF et al
as 1:2015cv00460
Plaintiff:
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY , INDIAN RIVER COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT and OLD VERO ICE AGE SITES COMMITTEE, INC.
Defendant:
PETER M. ROGOFF and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Intervenor_defendant:
AAF HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United Motorcoach Association, v. Peter Rogoff
as 10-5214
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United Motorcoach Association, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Peter M. Rogoff, Honorable, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration
American Bus Association v. Peter Rogoff, et al
as 10-5213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Bus Association
Defendant - Appellant:
Peter M. Rogoff, Honorable, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration and Federal Transit Administraton
UNITED MOTORCOACH ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ROGOFF
as 1:2010cv00701
Plaintiff:
UNITED MOTORCOACH ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
PETER M. ROGOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
AMERICAN BUS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ROGOFF et al
as 1:2010cv00686
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN BUS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
PETER M. ROGOFF and FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
PARKRIDGE 6, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2009cv01478
Plaintiff:
PARKRIDGE 6, LLC and DULLES CORRIDOR USERS GROUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RAY LAHOOD, PETER M. ROGOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United Motorcoach Association v. Peter Rogoff
as 09-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United Motorcoach Association
Defendant - Appellee:
Peter M. Rogoff, Administrator, Federal Transit Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
