Cases 31 - 40 of 196
MELTON v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-02176
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MELTON
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
LEWIS v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-02174
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA LEWIS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
LEWIS et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01838
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA LEWIS and JAMES G.B. LEWIS
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH & UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
THOMPSON et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01810
Plaintiff:
RENEE THOMPSON and DARREN THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , SECANT MEDICAL , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
BUFFINGTON et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01836
Plaintiff:
MARGARET BUFFINGTON and DONALD BUFFINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
ELDER et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01837
Plaintiff:
CAROL ELDER and HENRY ELDER, JR.
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
MACKENZIE et al v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01839
Plaintiff:
LAURIE MACKENZIE and GERALD MACKENZIE
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON INC. , GYNECARE and others
SLEDGE v. ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01835
Plaintiff:
ALICE SLEDGE
Defendant:
ETHICON WOMEN'S HEALTH AND UROLOGY , ETHICON, INC. , GYNECARE and others
EZELL v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01809
Plaintiff:
MARESHA EZELL
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. , SECANT MEDICAL , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
MCBRIDE v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-01805
Plaintiff:
CARRIE MCBRIDE
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION , American Medical Systems Inc , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
