Cases
Public Utility District No. 1 v. BPA
as 10-73372
Petitioner: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Idaho Power Company v. BPA, et al
as 09-73289
Petitioner: IDAHO POWER COMPANY
: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHINGTON, PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC, NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES and others
Intervenor: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY and others
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PGE v. DOE, et al
as 09-73288
Petitioner: PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHINGTON, PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., PACIFICORP and others
Intervenor: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY and others
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Public Utility District No. 1 v. BPA
as 09-73252
Petitioner: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON
: NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Intervenor: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PACIFICORP and others
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Puget Sound Energy, Inc. v. BPA, et al
as 09-70262
Petitioner: PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC.
Intervenor: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY WASHINGTON, IDAHO POWER COMPANY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE and others
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION and DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amicus Curiae: NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES
Public Utility District No. 1 v. BPA
as 08-74900
Petitioner: PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Intervenor: ALCOA INC.
Respondent: BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?