Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Core Communications, Inc. v. FCC
as 08-1365
Petitioner:
Core Communications, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
EarthLink, Inc., O1 Communications, Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T Inc., Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Central Telephone Company and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Arizona Corporation Commission
Covad Comm Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 05-1095
Petitioner:
Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Terminated Party:
AT&T Corporation, ATX Licensing, Inc., Curry Communications, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Ciena Corporation, Time Warner Telecom, Inc., Promoting Active Competition Everywhere Coalition and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Line Systems, Inc. and ATX Communications, Inc.
In re: Core Comm Inc
as 04-1368
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Core Communications, Inc.
Intervenor:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, SBC Communications Inc. and Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
:
, , and others
AT&T Corp v. FCC, et al
as 01-1467
Petitioner:
AT&T Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Association of Communications Enterprises, Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., United States LEC Corp. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Qwest Communications International Inc.
WrldCom Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1218
Petitioner:
WorldCom Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Sprint Corporation, Association of Communications Enterprises, Competitive Telecommunications Association and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
Terminated Party:
VoiceStream Wireless Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
