Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Troy Capital, LLC v. Patenaude & Felix APC et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Angie Hong Hoar, Kristopher C Childers, Patenaude & Felix APC and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bustos v. Patenaude & Felix, APC
as 2:2017cv01468
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Bustos
Defendant:
Patenaude & Felix, APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bustos v. Patenaude & Felix, APC
as 2:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Bustos
Defendant:
Patenaude & Felix, APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOT USED
as 2:2015cv01215
Defendant:
Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, APC and Daniel Trudel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Trudel v. Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, APC
as 2:2015cv01216
Defendant:
Law Offices of Patenaude & Felix, APC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trudel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Benavente et al v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 et al
as 2:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Andresina Benavente and Tricia Benavente
Defendant:
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3 and Patenaude & Felix APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roadhouse et al v. Patenaude & Felix, APC
as 2:2013cv00560
Defendant:
Patenaude & Felix, APC
Plaintiff:
Scott Roadhouse and Trina Roadhouse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bradford v. Patenaude & Felix, APC
as 2:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lauriann Bradford
Defendant:
Patenaude & Felix, APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Target National Bank vs Mary Brooksbank
as 3:2007cv00581
Counter Defendant:
Target National Bank
ThirdParty Defendant:
PATENAUDE & FELIX, APC and Westley U. Villanueva
Counter Claimant:
MARY BROOKSBANK
Plaintiff:
Target National Bank
Defendant:
MARY BROOKSBANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
