Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA
as 10-1239
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Dana Rohrabacher, U.S. Representative, California 46th District and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Dana Rohrabacher, U.S. Representative, California 46th District and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Southeastern Legal Foundation, v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner:
John Shimkus, U.S. Representative, Illinois 19th District, John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Glass Association of North America, State of North Carolina, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Municipal Gas Commission of Missouri and American Chemistry Council
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA, et al
as 10-1094
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., The Langdale Company, Langdale Forest Products Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA
as 10-1083
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., The Langdale Company, Langdale Forest Products Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Southeastern Legal Foundation,, et al v. EPA
as 10-1035
Petitioner:
Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., The Langdale Company, Langdale Forest Products Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Union of Concerned Scientists
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
