Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Apple Corps Limited v. THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
as 0:2022cv61675
Plaintiff:
Apple Corps Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations, dalvyeshop, geryheu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
VO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07961
Plaintiff:
PHONG THANH VO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. Talentsy, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00724
Plaintiff:
Kyle Anderson, Michael Robinson and Talentsy LLC
Defendant:
Talentsy, Inc., Jake William Jones and Samai Phong Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Apple Corps Limited et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 0:2021cv61373
Plaintiff:
Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Business Entities And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, dalabshop.com, groveblankets.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
NGUYEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15451
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHONG NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOUA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85785
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHONG MOUA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31044
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHONG DINH BUI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NGUYEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12259
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHONG TAM NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
