Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JACQUES et al v. JEAN-BAPTISTE et al
as 1:2023cv03480
Plaintiff:
SALIM JACQUES, SALEM JACQUES and DMT MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
MARC JEAN-BAPTISTE, NOE JEAN-BAPTISTE, EMMANUEL COFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROSENGART v. PIERRE et al
as 1:2023cv02863
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSENGART
Defendant:
CARL PIERRE, RYAN MACAULAY and ANDREA MACAULAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
FATTOUCH et al v. REPUBLIC OF LEBANON et al
as 1:2020cv02599
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA FATTOUCH, PIERRE FATTOUCH and UNITED LEBANESE QUARRIES AND CRUSHERS COMPANY S.A.L.
Defendant:
MARIE-CLAUD NAJIM, THE REPUBLIC OF LEBANON and REPUBLIC OF LEBANON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HINES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2020cv01901
Plaintiff:
PIERRE HINES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WATSON v. FARIS et al
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE WATSON
Defendant:
MARK H. WITTSTADT, ERIC VANDEL LINDE, MICHAEL KOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RENOIR v. DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID
as 1:2015mc00225
Plaintiff:
PIERRE A. RENOIR
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF MEDICAID
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
JEAN-PIERRE
as 1:2013cv01586
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JEAN-PIERRE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LIEBMAN et al v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
JAY LIEBMAN and ANDREA LIEBMAN
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, JOSEPH ACKERMAN, HUGO BANZIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SAINT-FLEUR v. MCHUGH
as 1:2013cv01019
Defendant:
JOHN M. MCHUGH
Plaintiff:
PIERRE E. SAINT-FLEUR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DEABREU v. WELLS FARGO BANK
as 1:2012mc00322
Petitioner:
LOUIS PIERRE DEABREU
Respondent:
WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
