Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Southlake Specialty Hospital, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southlake, Rockwall Regional Center, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Rockwall, Flower Mound Hospital Partners, LLC, 15-cv-01793, doing business as Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Flower Mound and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
WINDER HMA LLC et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
WINDER HMA LLC , BARTOW HMA, LLC , BILOXI HMA LLC and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
PLANTZ et al v. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC
as 1:2014cv00653
Plaintiff:
SCOTT H. PLANTZ
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC , AMORY HMA, LLC , ANNISTON HMA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NURKIN v. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC., et al
as 1:2014cv00605
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC , CHARLOTTE HMS, LLC and PUNTA GORDA HMA, LLC.
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY NURKIN
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
MEYER vs. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. et. al.
as 1:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
PAUL MEYER
Defendant:
BARTOW HMA, INC. , BRANDON HMA, LLC. , GAFFNEY HMA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
IN RE: HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. QUI TAM LITIGATION (NO. II)
as 1:2014mc00339
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S. BRUMMER , THOMAS L. MASON , STEVEN G. FOLSTAD and others
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. , MONROE HMA LLC , WINDER HMA LLC and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
