Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ABREGO et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv08190
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ABREGO, ANTONIO AGUILAR, JOSE R AGUILERA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
JESUS R RIVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03508
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R RIVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACKERMAN et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ACKERMAN, JORGE IBRAIN ADRIAN, JOSE DIMAS ALFARO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivas v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv24100
Plaintiff:
Jose R Rivas
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Rivas v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv24098
Plaintiff:
Jose R Rivas
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
RIVAS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
SHARON R RIVAS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ponce v. Dependable Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv23688
Plaintiff:
Jose Ponce
Defendant:
Dependable Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. , Manuel R. Rivas and Antonio Rivas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Salazar v. Dependable Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv21484
Plaintiff:
Raul Salazar
Defendant:
Dependable Warehousing & Distribution, Inc., Manuel R. Rivas and Anonio Rivas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
