Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Acosta v. Woodhaven Pro Services Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc01978
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Yahaira Almanzar and Woodhaven Pro Services Inc.
Medical Dynamic Systems ,Inc. v. Acosta
as 1:2018cv03871
Plaintiff:
Medical Dynamic Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
R. Alexander Acosta and DOL's Administrative Review Board
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Acosta v. Plateau Painting Co. Inc.
as 7:2018mc00091
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Plateau Painting Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Acosta v. Don Antorino Sewer & Dran Inc. et al
as 2:2018mc00738
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Donald Antorino and Don Antorino Sewer & Dran Inc.
Acosta v. Fusilli at Miller Place, Inc. et al
as 2:2018mc00426
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Fusilli at Miller Place, Inc. and Chad Powell
Acosta v. Fusilli at Miller Place, Inc. d/b/a Fusilli Restaurant and Pizzeria et al
as 2:2018mc00323
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Fusilli at Miller Place, Inc. d/b/a Fusilli Restaurant and Pizzeria and Chad Powell
Acosta v. Brothers II Landscapes, Inc.
as 2:2018mc00108
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Brothers II Landscapes, Inc.
Acosta v. Mayerhauser Realty Inc.
as 1:2017mc00477
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Mayerhauser Realty Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor v. Mayerhauser Realty, Inc. 401K Plan & Trust
as 7:2017mc00452
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Mayerhauser Realty, Inc. 401K Plan & Trust
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
Compunnel Software Group Inc v. Gupta et al
as 1:2014cv04790
Petitioner:
Compunnel Software Group Inc
Respondent:
Arvind Gupta, Thomas E. Perez and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
