Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Blake v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-1791
Plaintiff:
LESTER PHILLIP BLAKE, JR.
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, D. GODFREY, Correctional Sergeant, Invidual, Correctional Officer D. BARBOUR, individual and others
Nathan Phillips v. R. Johnson
as 23-70091
Petitioner:
NATHAN D. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Floyd Scott v. R. Johnson
as 21-56365
Petitioner / Appellant:
FLOYD DEWAINE SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden
George Bridgette v. R. Johnson
as 21-55689
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE BRIDGETTE
Henry Hayes v. R. Johnson
as 21-55382
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY CEPHUS HAYES, AKA Henry M. Mitchell, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Tom Franks v. R. Johnson, et al
as 20-17497
Defendant / Appellee:
STANISLAUS SUPERIOR COURT, Judge #8, R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden, Lancaster State Prison and MICHAEL SCHEID, Attorney
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOM MARK FRANKS
Damiean Johnson v. R. Johnson
as 20-56035
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIEAN TREMAINE JOHNSON
Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. Johnson, et al
as 20-55991
Defendant / Appellee:
JIAN MA, Doctor, individual and official capacity, CMD STAFF, Unknown Name Doctor, individual and official capacity, R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, Warden, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN SEANZ SALCIDO
Jorge Perez v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-55971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANTONIO PEREZ, AKA Steven Mark Hamm
Defendant / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden, individual, M. TAMAYO, individual, GAVIN NEWSOM, individual and others
Raymond Berry v. R. Johnson
as 20-55927
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND GLEN BERRY
Respondent / Appellee:
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
