Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Wine & Corks LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Wine & Corks LLC doing business as Wine & Corks, Maria R. Ramos and Raymond Ramos
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Corral v. Ramos
as 6:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruiz Corral
Respondent:
Diley Romero Ramos and Diley Regla Romero Ramos
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Ruiz Corral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Ramos v. Kohl's Inc.
as 6:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Jessenia Ramos
Defendant:
Kohl's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
v. Ramos et al
as 1:2022cv21618
Defendant:
Crystallee Ramos, Dr. Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Ramos v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv21619
Plaintiff:
Crystallee Ramos
Defendant:
Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and Mia Aesthetics Clinics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
