Cases 1 - 4 of 4
FTC v. Red Cedar Services, Inc., et al
as 22-16484
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash, AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
E.T.S. VENTURES, LLC, EL DORADO TRAILER SALES, LLC, DALE E. BECKER and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM, DEBORAH MOSS and FIRST PREMIER BANK
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID FEINGOLD, DYLAN, JAGGER INVESTMENT CO., HOMEOWNERS REALTY, LLC and others
Appellee:
KIM TUCKER
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
FTC, et al v. E.T.S. Ventures, LLC, et al
as 18-15401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Objector - Appellee:
FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST
Intervenor - Appellee:
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM
Defendant - Appellee:
RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash, AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
E.T.S. VENTURES, LLC, EL DORADO TRAILER SALES, LLC and DALE E. BECKER
Receiver - Appellee:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA, Court Appointed Monitor
FTC, et al v. AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al
as 17-15552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Objector - Appellee:
FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK & TRUST
Intervenor - Appellee:
AMERICANS FOR FINANCIAL REFORM
Defendant - Appellee:
AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash and others
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
E.T.S. VENTURES, LLC and EL DORADO TRAILER SALES, LLC
Receiver - Appellee:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA, Court Appointed Monitor
FTC v. AMG Services, Inc., et al
as 14-16468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
AMG SERVICES, INC., RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash and others
Defendant:
AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, LEVEL 5 MOTORSPORTS, LLC, LEADFLASH CONSULTING, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
