Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 552
Warren v. Dollar Tree, Inc., et al.
as 24-1603
Plaintiff: ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant: DOLLAR TREE, INC., DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, JEFF DAVIS and others
WheelImage Corp. v. Axial Manufacturing, et al.
as 24-1381
Plaintiff: WHEELIMAGE CORP.
Defendant: AXIAL MANUFACTURING, VF ENGINEERING, RICK EMMETT and others
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff: DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant: STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Rhode, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-542
Plaintiff / Appellee: KIM RHODE, GARY BRENNAN, CORY HENRY and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Cole v. Hill
as 24-365
Petitioner: TOMMY COLE
Respondent: RICK HILL
Douglas v. Hill, et al.
as 23-4324
Petitioner / Appellant: PATRICK C. DOUGLAS
Respondent / Appellee: RICK HILL and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Barstow Proprietor Association, et al. v. City of Barstow, et al.
as 23-3935
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARSTOW PROPRIETOR ASSOCIATION, BALUBHAI G. PATEL, IRA GWIN and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF BARSTOW, a municipal corporation, MEGHAN A. WHARTON and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Joseph v. Hill, et al.
as 23-3133
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES JOSEPH
Respondent / Appellee: RICK HILL
Respondent: PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?