Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gardner et al v. Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02055
3Rd Party Defendant:
Huggins Insurance Services, Inc. and Bliss Sequoia Insurance & Risk Advisors, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Christian Gardner and Peter Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, LLC v. Sam L. Herceg dba De Ja Vu Construction et al
as 3:2019cv00703
Defendant:
Sam L. Herceg dba De Ja Vu Construction, Steven T. and Theresa Elizabeth Alexakos as Trustees of the Steven T. Alexakos and Theresa Elizabeth Alexakos Family Trust and Sam L. Herceg dba De Ja Vue Contriction
Plaintiff:
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.