Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Harter v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv07443
Plaintiff:
David Harter
Defendant:
BP P.L.C., Statoil, ASA, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
McDonnell et al v. Royal Dutch Shell plc et al
as 1:2013cv07089
Plaintiff:
Kevin McDonnell , Anthony Insinga , Robert Michiels and others
Defendant:
Royal Dutch Shell plc, BP PLC, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Chartier v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv05577
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chartier
Defendant:
BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell, PLC, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Karkut v. Royal Dutch Shell PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04872
Plaintiff:
William Karkut
Defendant:
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, BP PLC, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1 Personal Property
White Oaks Fund LP v. BP PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04553
Plaintiff:
White Oaks Fund LP
Defendant:
BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts
Benvenuto v. BP P.L.C. Royal Dutch Shell PLC et al
as 1:2013cv04142
Plaintiff:
Patricia Benvenuto
Defendant:
BP P.L.C. Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Statoil ASA and John Doe Nos. 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Smith v. BP Plc et al
as 1:2013cv03944
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Defendant:
BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
as 7:2013cv03473
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd.
Defendant:
BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Prime International Trading, Ltd. v. BP Plc et al
as 1:2013cv03473
Plaintiff:
Prime International Trading, Ltd.
Defendant:
BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Statoil ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
