Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Murray et al v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Murray and Marlyn Carrothers
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., CBS Corporation , Marlyn Carrothers and others
Cross_claimant:
Cleaver-Brooks Inc. , Trane US Inc. , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Allen et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen and Lou Ann Allen
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
