Cases 1 - 10 of 1,929
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Coleman v. City of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-2939
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH LEPORE, CHERYL HOOTEN and others
Argueta Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2953
Petitioner:
SARA ESTER ARGUETA RAMOS, PAOLA SARAI RAMIREZ ARGUETA and BRENDA LIZETH HILARIO ARGUETA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2907
Petitioner:
MONICA RAMIREZ-RINCON and NICOLAS ALEXIS ORTEGA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Godinez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-2788
Petitioner:
ANABEL GODINEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner:
MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
