Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bojan et al v. Infinium Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chris Bojan , Kurt V. Cornielsen , Garrett Fife and others
Defendant:
Infinium Capital Holdings, LLC, INFINIUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, George Hanley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Padron et al v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2013cv00981
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement , Ricardo Wong , Christopher McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Digno Padron , Raul Valdez Banuelos , Ahmed Yusuf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Larez et al
as 1:2012cv08720
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan Gonzalez Ramirez and Mi Lindo Nayarit #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Certain personal property associated with Alma Yesenia Garcia-Ramirez
as 3:2011mc00024
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Certain personal property associated with Alma Yesenia Garcia-Ramirez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
