Other Personal Injury Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 160
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: CVS RX Services, Inc., Discount Drug Mart, Inc., CVS Indiana, L.L.C. and others
Interested Party: United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor: USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master: Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent: Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant: Christopher C. Smith
Not Classified By Court: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae: Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner: Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
County of Trumbull v. Purdue Pharma L.P.
as 1:2018op45079
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: County of Trumbull
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc., Walgreen Co, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-5000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Harris v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45677
Defendant: Arun Sharma, Abbott Laboratories, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Interested Party: Illinois Union Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: County of Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Map to Health d/b/a Recovery Unplugged v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2021op45093
Plaintiff: MAP TO HEALTH d/b/a Recovery Unplugged
Defendant: AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
MS. Center for Police & Sheriff's et al v. Amerisource Bergen Drug Corporation, et al.
as 1:2021op45075
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: LifeStream Behavioral Center, Inc. Eaves Law Firm Client doing business as LifeStream Behavioral Hospital doing business as Addictions Receiving Facility doing business as Anthony House doing business as Adult Choice doing business as Connections, Re and MS. Center for Police & Sheriff's
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Tuscarawas, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45098
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: The County of Tuscarawas, Ohio, The State of Ohio ex rel. Prosecuting Attorney of Tuscarawas County, Ryan Styer, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Clearwater in the County of Pinellas v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45009
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff: City of Clearwater in the County of Pinellas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lincoln County v. Sackler et al
as 1:2020op45069
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff: Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Camden County v. Williams et al
as 1:2020op45068
Defendant: Caremark Rx, L.L.C., McKesson Corporation, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff: Camden County
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
County of Hawaii v. Endo Health Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45014
Defendant: Raymond Sackler Family, purdue pharma l.p, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: County of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?