Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re Public Docket - the Appointment of Pamela K. Chen as Special Master
as 1:2017mc01302
Movant:
Richard Behar, DCReport.org, et al, Forbes Media LLC and others
Respondent:
John Doe and USA
Interested Party:
Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
IN RE Public Documents filed in 12 MC 0557 BMC
as 1:2016mc00706
Movant:
John Doe
Respondent:
Jody Kriss, Richard E. Lerner, Richard Roe and others
Interested Party:
Frederick M Oberlander, The New York Times Company and U.S.A.
Intervenor:
The Associated Press
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE Public Documents filed in 12 MC 0557(BMC), Motion for Civil Contempt by John Doe
as 1:2016mc00706
Movant:
John Doe
Respondent:
Richard E. Lerner, Richard Roe, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP and others
Interested Party:
Frederick M Oberlander, The Associated Press, The New York Times Company and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Limtung v. Steven J. Baum, P.C. et al
as 1:2016cv00100
Defendant:
Steven J. Baum, Steven J. Baum, P.C., Jason Burr and others
Plaintiff:
Hin Y. Limtung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re Motion for Civil Contempt by John Doe
as 1:2012mc00557
Movant:
John Doe
Respondent:
Richard E. Lerner, Richard Roe and Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP
Interested Party:
U.S.A.
United States et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 1:2011cv05457
Plaintiff:
John Doe 11-CV 5457-1, John Doe 11-CV 5457-2, State of New York and others
Defendant:
Richard Roe 11-CV-5457
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In the Matter of the Claim of Einer Jiminez v. County Of Nassau et al
as 1:2008mc00295
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Claim of Einer Jiminez
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, The Nassau County Correctional Ctr., Rashawn Beeks and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
