Cases 11 - 20 of 323
Brendan Nasby v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDAN NASBY
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD BYRNE, SAC #49, STATE OF NEVADA, TARA CARPENTER and others
Carl Olsen, III v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 20-16755
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, RENEE BAKER, Warden, ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARL HENRY OLSEN III
Reginald Franklin v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 20-16547
Petitioner / Appellant:
REGINALD FRANKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Pasqual Lozano v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 20-16336
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
PASQUAL LOZANO
Richard Gates v. Valaree Olivas, et al
as 20-16135
Defendant:
T. LINDBERG and R. LORTON, C/O
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden, BRUCE HARKREADER, VALAREE OLIVAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD R. GATES
Keith Smith v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 20-15766
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH G. SMITH
Kevin Almy v. Dwayne Baze, et al
as 20-15355
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD HELLING, RUBEN VIDAURRI, J. BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Charles Wirth v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 20-15353
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES WIRTH and CHARLES M. WIRTH
Richard Gates v. Don Poag, et al
as 20-15198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD R. GATES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS and DON POAG
Defendant:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and K. HEGGE
Billy Perkins v. Robert LeGrand, et al
as 19-17605
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
BILLY WAYNE PERKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
