Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Mineworker's Pension Scheme, et al v. Citrix Systems, Inc., et al
as 23-12942
Interested Party:
MINEWORKER'S PENSION SCHEME and BRITISH COAL STAFF SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., DAVID HENSHALL, ROBERT M. CALDERONI and others
Vargas v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv62327
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Vargas
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Finger v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02976
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Rodriguez v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Gould v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
William Gould
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci Caldwell and others
Shumacher v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01453
Plaintiff:
Leo Shumacher
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Messiha v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02094
Plaintiff:
George Messiha
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Stein v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01864
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
O'Dell v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc., Robert M. Calderoni, Nanci E. Caldwell and others
Gervat v. Henshall et al
as 0:2022cv60168
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
David J. Henshall, Robert M Calderoni, Arlen Shenkman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
