Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, et al
as 24-1049
Petitioner:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Namandje Bumpus, Ph.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Norwich Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5311
Plaintiff:
Norwich Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1298
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Cigar Association of America, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-5220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cigar Association of America, Cigar Rights of America and Premium Cigar Association
Not Yet Classified:
Alec Bradley Cigar Distributors, Inc., Ashton Distributors, Inc., Holt Cigar Company, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, et al
as 23-5200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor / Appellee:
Invagen Pharmaceuticals, INC.
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1099
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1049
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Melinta Therapeutics, LLC, et al v. FDA, et al
as 22-5288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Melinta Therapeutics, LLC and Rempex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, In his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Sandoz Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 22-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandoz Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
