Other Statutes Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 81 - 88 of 88
ANBAR v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv02117
Plaintiff: SARAWAN ANBAR
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, MICHAEL MUKASEY, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
DIZAYEE v. CHERTOFF, et al
as 1:2007cv02053
Plaintiff: HOGER A. DIZAYEE
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
KELLY et al v. UPCHURCH et al
as 1:2007cv01601
Plaintiff: LEO KELLY, MARGARET KELLY, JACK KELLY and others
Defendant: EVELYN UPCHURCH, PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JEVREMOVIC v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv01278
Petitioner: JELA JEVREMOVIC
Respondent: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
PEREVOZSKAYA v. UPCHURCH et al
as 1:2007cv01043
Plaintiff: INNA T. PEREVOZSKAYA
Defendant: EVELYN UPCHURCH, PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SUN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00646
Plaintiff: YUYU SUN and MINGHUA MA
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALES, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
LIU v. NOVAK et al
as 1:2007cv00263
Plaintiff: ZAIGANG LIU
Defendant: PAUL NOVAK, EMILIO GONZALEZ and ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DURRANI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00140
Plaintiff: SARFRAZ DURRANI, SARFRAZ DURRANI, GIHANE ASKAR and others
Defendant: MICHAEL CHERTOFF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EMELIO T. GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?