Cases 1 - 10 of 14
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner:
In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
David Zavala v. Commissioner, Georgia DOC, et al
as 21-11812
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations, REGIONAL DIRECTOR TAYLOR, GD&CP/SMU, WARDEN, GD&CP/SMU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 21-11400
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, DELOACH, FNU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
David Zavala v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 21-10989
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKY MYRICK, TIMOTHY C. WARD, In his individual and official capacity, ROBERT TOOLE, Director of Field Operations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ZAVALA
USA v. Robert Toole
as 21-10651
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT TOOLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Amerson v. Sherry Bland, et al
as 21-10194
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS ROBERT TOOL, Regional Director G.D.C., individually and official capacities, GREGORY DOZIER, Dept. of Corrections, individually and official capacities, TIMOTHY WARD, Commissioner, individually and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LEE AMERSON
Brandon Morrall v. Warden, et al
as 21-10144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON MORRALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, JOSHUA JONES and ROBERT TOOLE, (field director) all of Hays State Prison
Mark Reed v. Robert Toole, et al
as 20-10802
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT TOOLE, MARTY ALLEN and WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK RUDOLPH ARSENIO REED
Mark Reed v. Robert Toole, et al
as 20-10383
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT TOOLE, MARTY ALLEN and WARDEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK RUDOLPH ARSENIO REED
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 19-14295
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVE UPTON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
