Cases 1 - 10 of 26
McDade et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. et al
as 4:2019cv00150
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co. and Sears Holdings Corporation
Plaintiff:
Freddie McDade and Verla A Mitchell McDade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 4:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Annette Abbott
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 4:2016cv00766
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Adams
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casias v. Sears Roebuck and Company et al
as 1:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Gloriamae Casias
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company , BH North America Corporation and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pauli et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 2:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Pauli and Gerald T Pauli
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company , Spirit Delivery and Distribution Services Inc and Heritage Couriers LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerlach v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 2:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Gerlach
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Emerson Electric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Mary Garcia
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. Sears Roebuck and Co.,
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Roger Adams
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co.,
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330 IRS: Notice & Opportunity for Hearing Before Levy
Sosko v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dianne Sosko
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Polando v. Sears Roebuck & Company et al
as 5:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Polando
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Company , Whirlpool Corporation , General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
