Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Teamsters Local Union 786 v. Blevins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06317
Defendant: RICHARD BLEVINS, STEVEN FISHER, KEVIN JARCHOW, DAVE MASHEK, MARTIN OZINGA, IV, EDWARD RIZZO, STEVEN WARNKE, AND MICHAEL YAUGER, TRUSTEES OF THE LUMBER EMPLOYEES LOCAL 786 RETIREMENT FUND, RICHARD BLEVINS, STEVEN FISHER, KEVIN JARCHOW, DAVE MASHEK, MARTIN OZINGA, IV, EDWARD RIZZO, STEVEN WARNKE, AND MICHAEL YAUGER, TRUSTEES OF THE LOCAL UNION 786 BUILDING MATERIAL PENSION FUND AND BUILD, RICHARD BLEVINS, STEVEN FISHER, KEVIN JARCHOW, DAVE MASHEK, MARTIN OZINGA, IV, EDWARD RIZZO, STEVEN WARNKE, AND MICHAEL YAUGER, TREUSTEES OF THE LOCAL 786 UNION SEVERANCE TRUST FUND and others
Plaintiff: TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 786, AN APPOINTING FIDUCIARY OF THE LOCAL 786 BUILDING MATERIALS PENSION FUND, THE BLDG MATERIAL CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS WELFARE FUND OF CHICAGO, THE LUMBER EMPLOYEES and Teamsters Local Union No. 786
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund et al v. Victory Spud Service, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02182
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund , Howard C. Murdoch , Ronald Sandack and others
Defendant: Victory Spud Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Olympic Wholesale Produce, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund , Chicago Area I.B. of T. Severance and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Olympic Wholesale Produce, Inc. and Nicholas Doumouras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. L. Sansone Motor Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund , Chicago Area I.B. of T. Severance and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: L. Sansone Motor Service, Inc., Charmaine Purchase and John Purchase
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Severa, et al v. Sebert Landscaping Company
as 16-4029
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHICAGO AREA I.B. OF T. SEVERANCE AND RETIREMENT FUND, by and through its Trustees, HOWARD C. MURDOCH, RONALD SANDACK and others
Defendant - Appellant: SEBERT LANDSCAPING COMPANY
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund et al v. G.E.M. Cartage & Handling, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08730
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund , Howard C. Murdoch , Ronald Sandack and others
Defendant: G.E.M. Cartage & Handling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund et al v. M.N.M. Produce Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01697
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Pension Trust Fund , Howard C. Murdoch , Ronald Sandack and others
Defendant: M.N.M. Produce Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Area I.B. of T. Severance and Retirement Fund et al v. Sebert Landscaping Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00338
Plaintiff: Chicago Area I.B. of T. Severance and Retirement Fund , Howard C. Murdoch , Ronald Sandack and others
Defendant: Sebert Landscaping Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
James Russ, et al v. South Water Market, Incorporat, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3613
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES RUSS, through his successor Michael G. Phillip, RONALD SANDACK, HOWARD C. MURDOCH and others
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTH WATER MARKET, INCORPORATED and WILLIAM STEINBARTH, individually
Murdoch et al v. Phoenix Produce Company et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff: Howard C. Murdoch , Ronald Sandack , Patrick Bruno and others
Defendant: Phoenix Produce Company and Jason Cyscon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?