Cases 1 - 10 of 11
City and County of San Francisco, et al v. BP PLC, et al
as 22-16812
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the San Francisco City Attorney
Defendant / Appellant:
BP PLC, a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others
City of Oakland, et al v. BP PLC, et al
as 22-16810
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through the City Attorney for the City of Oakland
Defendant / Appellant:
BP PLC, a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others
County of Maui v. Chevron USA Inc., et al
as 21-15318
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC., ALOHA PETROLEUM LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
City & County of Honolulu v. Sunoco LP, et al
as 21-15313
Defendant / Appellant:
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP., BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 100 inclusive
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
City of Oakland, et al v. BP P.L.C., et al
as 18-16663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by and through the Oakland City Attorney and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by and through the San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Defendant - Appellee:
BP P.L.C., a public limited company of England and Wales, CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and others
County of Santa Cruz, et al v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 18-16376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, individually and on behalf of The People of the State of California, CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, a municipal corporation, individually and on behalf of The People of the State of California and CITY OF RICHMOND, individually and on behalf of The People of the State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA INC., ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC and others
County of San Mateo, et al v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 18-80049
Plaintiff - Respondent:
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California, CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California and COUNTY OF MARIN, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California
Defendant - Petitioner:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION and others
County of Marin v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 18-15503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARIN, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION and others
City of Imperial Beach v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 18-15502
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION and others
County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 18-15499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, individually and on behalf of the People of the State of California
Defendant - Appellant:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., EXXONMOBIL CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
