Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Ruan v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2024cv03464
Plaintiff:
May Ruan
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and Will County Local 174 Welfare Fund v. Ruane Construction, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02461
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Will County Local 174 Carpenters Pension Trust Fund and Will County Local 174 Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund et al v. Ruane Construction, Inc., an Illinois corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
Midwest Operating Engineers Welfare Fund, Midwest Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund, Operating Engineers Local 150 Apprenticeship Fund and others
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc., an Illinois corporation and Mark Ruane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Health Fund et al v. Ruane Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Health Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Pension Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc. and Mark T. Ruane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local No. 502 et al v. Ruane Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04550
Plaintiff:
Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local No. 502, Cement Masons' Institute Local 502 Welfare Trust Fund, Cement Masons Local 502 and Plasterers Area 5 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc. and Mark Ruane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Health Fund et al v. Ruane Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04426
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Health Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Pension Fund, Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc. and Mark T. Ruane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv03880
Plaintiff:
BBC Studios Distribution Ltd
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shenzhen Xingman Industry Co., Ltd., Xiongxian Nine Carat Latex Products Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Viacom International Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02733
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, Dongguan Kunhong Plastic Products Co., Ltd., Dongguan Nuoyi Toys Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Emikeni, Inc. v. The Entities and Individuals Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
EK, Inc., Emikeni, Inc., Straplets, Inc. and others
Defendant:
The Entities and Individuals Identified in Schedule A, Yiwu Anna Belle Cosmetic Accessories Factory, Yiwu Belle Girl Hair Accessories Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund et al v. Ruane Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Welfare Fund, Fox Valley & Vicinity Construction Workers Pension Fund and Lake County, Illinois, Plasterers & Cement Masons Retirement Savings Fund
Defendant:
Ruane Construction, Inc. and Mark T. Ruane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
