Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15419
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN S. PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64792
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN S PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Caribbean Crossings, Ltd., Inc.
as 9:2019cv80284
Defendant:
Caribbean Crossings, Ltd., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos S. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Algar Telecom S/A et al
as 9:2019cv80262
Plaintiff:
Carol S. Parks, as Trustee and Carol S. Parks
Defendant:
GU Holdings Inc., Angola Cables S.A., Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVER LIGHT V, L.P. et al v. D & D FLORIDA IMPORTS INC. et al
as 1:2013cv24606
Plaintiff:
RIVER LIGHT V, L.P. and TORY BURCH LLC
Defendant:
D & D FLORIDA IMPORTS INC., KWANG S. PARK and YUNG S. PARK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Park v. Simm Associates, Inc.
as 9:2012cv81118
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey S. Park
Defendant:
Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Coach, Inc et al v. Cellular Plus Communications, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61289
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cellular Plus Communications, Inc., Richard S. Park and Gipsy Park
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel Inc. v. D & D Florida Imports, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv23151
Plaintiff:
Chanel Inc.
Defendant:
D & D Florida Imports, Inc., Kwang S. Park-Choi and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Star Trading International, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv01557
Plaintiff:
Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Star Trading International, Inc., Hee S. Park, Jin Park and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
