Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Richard Evans v. R. Milam, et al
as 21-16493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MILAM, Plant Operations at SATF, LEFFMAN and S. SHERMAN, Warden at SATF
Rafael Ferguson v. S. Sherman, et al
as 21-16359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAFAEL FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
S. SHERMAN, Warden at CSATF, E. GUZMAN, C. DE LA CRUZ, CCI at CSATF and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-55763
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daronta Lewis v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 21-15663
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, S. SHERMAN, NIKKI JOHNSON, Transport officer, SATF and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS
Richard Evans v. S. Sherman, et al
as 21-15177
Defendant / Appellee:
T. CISNEROS, Chief Deputy Warden, FIGEROA, E-Yard Librarian, J. OURIQUE, E-Yard Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Barry Brookins v. M. Hernandez, et al
as 20-17413
Defendant / Appellee:
M. HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer C-Fac, D. FOSTON, Appeals Examiner, L. SANCHEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY L. BROOKINS
Barry Brookins v. M. Hernandez, et al
as 20-16886
Defendant / Appellee:
M. HERNANDEZ, Correctional Officer C-Fac, D. FOSTON, Appeals Examiner, L. SANCHEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY L. BROOKINS
Jerry Dillingham v. N. Emerson, et al
as 20-16623
Defendant:
J. ZAMORA, D. SMITH, C. RAMOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
S. WESCOAT, Correctional Officer, D. VELASCO, Correctional Officer, E. WILSON, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY KENT DILLINGHAM
Jerry Dillingham v. F. Garcia, et al
as 20-15016
Defendant:
S. SHERMAN, S. SMITH, J. ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY KENT DILLINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
F. GARCIA
Jose Gomez v. S. Sherman
as 19-17582
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE VICTOR GOMEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
S. SHERMAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
